Post by account_disabled on Mar 7, 2024 0:52:38 GMT -7
To achieve it we must know the history the growth of Hamas as a militant group in the climate of devastation that followed the Oslo accords for those in Gaza whose promises of selfgovernment were never fulfilled the formation of other groups of Palestinians with other tactics and other objectives and the history of the Palestinian people and their aspirations for freedom and the right to political selfdetermination liberation from colonial rule and from widespread military and prison violence. Then we could be part of the fight for a free Palestine in which Hamas would be dissolved or ousted by groups with nonviolent aspirations for coexistence. For those whose moral position is limited to condemnation understanding the situation is not the goal.
This kind of moral indignation can be said to be both Russia Mobile Number List and presentist.to the history books to discover how events like these could happen and whether conditions could change such that a future of violence is not the only one possible. It should not be the case that contextualization is considered a morally problematic activity even if there are forms of contextualization that can be used to displace blame or exonerate. Can we distinguish between these two forms of contextualization The fact that some think that contextualizing horrendous violence diverts attention or even worse rationalizes it does not mean that we should give up on the claim that all forms of contextualization are morally relativizing in that way.
When the Harvard Palestine Solidarity Committee proclaims that the apartheid regime is solely to blame for Hamas attacks it subscribes to an unacceptable version of moral responsibility. To understand how an event came to be or what its meaning is we must learn some history. That means we have to broaden the focus beyond the atrocious present moment without denying its horror while refusing to let that horror represent all the horror that exists to represent and know and oppose . The contemporary media for the most part does not detail the horrors that the Palestinian people have experienced for decades in the form of bombings arbitrary attacks arrests and murders.
This kind of moral indignation can be said to be both Russia Mobile Number List and presentist.to the history books to discover how events like these could happen and whether conditions could change such that a future of violence is not the only one possible. It should not be the case that contextualization is considered a morally problematic activity even if there are forms of contextualization that can be used to displace blame or exonerate. Can we distinguish between these two forms of contextualization The fact that some think that contextualizing horrendous violence diverts attention or even worse rationalizes it does not mean that we should give up on the claim that all forms of contextualization are morally relativizing in that way.
When the Harvard Palestine Solidarity Committee proclaims that the apartheid regime is solely to blame for Hamas attacks it subscribes to an unacceptable version of moral responsibility. To understand how an event came to be or what its meaning is we must learn some history. That means we have to broaden the focus beyond the atrocious present moment without denying its horror while refusing to let that horror represent all the horror that exists to represent and know and oppose . The contemporary media for the most part does not detail the horrors that the Palestinian people have experienced for decades in the form of bombings arbitrary attacks arrests and murders.